And Now for the Spinoff Maneuver

Fartsworth has decided to spinoff!   Is this good for HMNY shareholders?  Is it good for MoviePass?  Is it good for Teddy?  Only time will tell.  Here’s my take.

First, for Shareholders, the spinoff could be good news.  HMNY is now one of the most loathed companies on all of Wall St., with a despised CEO, a business model the media loves to hate, and a ticker that means nothing to anyone, what is left worth saving in HMNY?

For investors, the best chance that HMNY and or the new MoviePass ticker returns some capital to beleaguered shareholders is if 2 things happen.

1) MoviePass finds a solvent way to move forward

2) HMNY actually delivers a decent dividend to shareholders of the new MoviePass INC.

In the PR release Fartsworth tried to include some BS about Zones, and that they had this plan of spinning out companies all along, that is all just total nonsense.   None of that stuff matters, there is nothing left when HMNY spins off Moviepass, everyone knows that.

What really happened here is Fartsworth could not deliver on the money he promised to Lowe and to Moviepass and as a result, they are looking for an amicable divorce.   The story went sort of like this.  Mitch thought he had found a white night in Fartsworth who could fund MoviePass through its planned expansion to get to 5 Million users.   Both Lowe and Fartsworth badly underestimated the cash burn it would take to get there, and both also badly underestimated how fast the service would catch on with such an unbelievable deal.  So as subscriber numbers went into hypergrowth, and cash burn went to mach 10, everyone, inluding Lowe and Fartsworth started to freak out.   Wall Street spooked, knowing that the only way to get enough cash for the experiment was to sell ever more shares.  Fartsworth was either too stupid, or too crooked, or just plain too unlucky to prove to Lowe that he could deliver the goods and make the marriage work.

Lowe was using Fartsworth for money – Not trying to be sexist, but Fartsworth was the sugar daddy, and Lowe was the golddigger.   When the money (or even the promise of money) dried up, Lowe lost interest in his new found friend.   And now the divorce proceedings are on.   Fartsworth could never get that last 8% of Moviepass to own it all, and knowing that all the old guard at HMNY now despises him, and that the folks at MoviePass now basically were done with him, he had to make a move to try and save whatever he could for himself.   Fartsworth also knowing that HMNY was now in the crosshairs of the New York AG, and that the SEC and NASDAQ had had just about enough of his Reverse Split, ATM share dumping shenanigans Fartsworth had to find his next move.

The spinoff could be the answer to Fartsworth’s prayers.   First, it clears MoviePass from all the shareholder lawsuits, AG inquiries, and other nasty baggage from Wall Street.  HMNY can simply spinoff Moviepass, and let HMNY live or die, or whatever – it really doesn’t matter all that much.  Maybe they can find some other bullshit company like Zones to get people excited with, who knows.

MoviePass will almost certainly remove Teddy from ANY operating role at the company, the guy is a total liability, and even he may realize this by now.  Almost certainly Lowe will be the CEO, and Ted will get a sacrificial BOD seat promotion.   Promoting idiotic CEO’s to BOD seats is a well-honored tradition in the corporate world.  Everybody wins, the CEO saves face, the company gets new leadership, and nobody has to admit they were idiotic.  He will be demoted/ promoted to one voting member of several.  He already has his seat, and you can bet that all or most of the other BOD members will treat Ted with all the respect he deserves :-).   For Fartsworth, he can save some face, he can chalk up the spinoff as a great strategic move.  He can stay on as CEO of HMNY until it totally withers to oblivion or they concoct their next Fartsworth scam company.   It is even possible that Ted could step down from HMNY shortly after the spinoff, take a BOD seat on both companies, collect money and call it all good.  Who knows what will happen to handsome Ted.  Jail would be good, but that looks increasingly unlikely now.

Spinoffs are a funny thing.  They can go really great, or really terrible in lots of different ways.   When I was at Microsoft we spun off Expedia, it was great for the people who went with the spinoff, it was not particularly great for shareholders of Microsoft or the employees who were left behind.   Expedia is now a $17 Billion dollar company – long shareholders of EXPD were richly rewarded.

However, There was no dividend for MSFT shareholders, and I can tell you if there were, it would have been a VERY nice thing to have.   Microsoft first spun off Expedia for a measly $75 million in an IPO in 1999.  It then sold the remaining portion of Expedia to IAC in 2001 for $1.8 Billion.   Not a bad return, but shareholders of Microsft hardly noticed any difference, and employees that were left behind were certainly not happy to have missed the opportunity to be part of a successful IPO and big market winner.  That said, IPO shareholders of the original IPO in Expedia did TERRIFIC!  Who wouldn’t love to see the HMNY spinoff of Moviepass see similar results to Expedia?!!

Expedia was in a similar spot to MoviePass when it was originally spun out of Microsoft.   It was losing money, it needed more capital to survive.  It was an innovative idea, in a very new and disruptive marketplace.  Many can barely remember the days of Travel Agents in strip malls, millennials can’t even comprehend travel prior to Expedia, and the like.   However, back in 1999 there were as many people inside Microsoft that thought Expedia would never make it, as there were believers.  That is in fact why they spun it out.  The leaders of the Expedia business inside Microsoft were furious they could not get enough funding and traction from inside Microsoft itself to go after their business plan.   The felt they had a much better chance of finding funding, and investing and focusing on the business outside of the clutches of Microsft and they wanted to be free!

Well – over the long term, the Expedia Management was 100% correct.  The company has been massively successful and has come a very long way from losing millions on tiny revenue numbers inside of Microsoft.   If you had purchased Expedia at the initial IPO, you would be the very happy owner of both Expedia and IAC stock, both of which have skyrocketed over the past several years.   If you had simply held MSFT – you also would have done just fine.  So there were no real big losers in this deal.

So to answer the question, will this ultimately be good for HMNY shareholders.  I think the answer is more likely yes than no.  Getting Fartsworth away from an operating role, and as far away from a CEO seat is a big win for the MoviePass business (and for humanity!)  The likelihood that Mitch Lowe can now take over what’s left of MoviePass and turn it into a good solid company looks much more favorable now.   Will HMNY shareholders get their “fair share” of the new MP INC?   MAYBE!  I mean, it’s Fartsworth we are talking about here so things could get screwed up before the spinoff in any number of ways.   But there are a lot of other VERY interested parties here.  Minority interests do have a say in these things, and with an AG watching, and the SEC and NASDAQ not really wanting to see more bullshit from Fartsworth, I don’t think he can screw HMNY shareholders out of at least some semblance of their fair share of the spinout company MP INC.

So my take, this is likely positive for everyone involved.  Even Fartsworth.  He doesn’t deserve it because he is a liar and he is stupid.  But the rest of the gang does deserve it.   MP customers, investors and employees all deserve a break, and I think the spinoff is the break that helps them all.  IF – and it is still a big IF, Moviepass can find a way to hold on to a couple million subs, and shore up the value prop from here, they could survive and someday thrive.  But there is nothing sure about any of this.  It is risky as hell, and certainly not a risk worth more than 1% of your total portfolio.





The Value of Moviepass – Something to Ponder

Moviepass even with all of its hassles continues to be a great deal. That much is obvious when considering that for $9.95 a subscriber can save money by going to the theater just one time, and if they use the subscription to the max, they can get somewhere around $30 to $50 in value depending on when and where the pass is used.

I thought it might be fun to compare Moviepass to other ways consumers might blow their cash to entertain themselves. So here’s a short list of of entertainment options compared to the value of Moviepass…

We could go bowling… as Gaffigan says. But bowling these days is generally around $20 or more per bowler. For that you could buy 2 months of Moviepass and go out to the movies up to 6 times.

If bowling is not your thing – how about golf? Apparently the average green fee is around $34 for a public course. But you have to have clubs and the fancy pants and shoes to really get out there. For that you get 3 months of MP or 9 Movies. And you would have some money leftover to buy a popcorn and a drink!

Golf a little slow? How about a day skiing? According to “Snow Online” the average cost of a lift ticket in the US is now up to $94. And if you think movie concessions are expensive, try ski lodge concessions! And don’t forget the 2 hour drive, the expensive equipment rental or purchase. It’s enough to make you want to just go see a movie! And for that price, you could see at least 27 movies or have 9 months worth of Moviepass! With plenty left over to take a friend or two or three!

Maybe you prefer to do something less active? How about a concert? Well we all know that is going to set you back some real money. For good seats at a good show we are talking about $120. Or a full year of Moviepass, or 36 movies! Now that’s a lot of entertainment hours by comparison:-)

Well, how about a Broadway show! Turns out that is going to hit your wallet hard as well. According to statisa that will be $127 big ones!

Do you like Speed? How about a day at the races? NASCAR perhaps? Average ticket there $96.14. Plus parking, plus a LOT of hassle getting in and out. Let’s just call that about a year of Moviepass again. And that is being kind on the hassle charges.

How about an NFL game? Forget about it! No matter where your favorite team plays – it’s more than a full year of Moviepass!

We can talk about other entertainment options that are cheaper than Moviepass. Going on a walk is free! Sex can and should be free! You can share a Netflix account for less. Or you can buy a digital TV antenna off Amazon for about $30 bucks and get your locals for free!

Let’s face it, the cost of Moviepass is super low, and it is a fantastic value compared to just about any other entertainment option.

So as we sit and ponder if Moviepass subscriber numbers will flame out or continue to grow under the new 3 movies a month value proposition. It’s worth considering, do consumers have a lot of better options for the money?

A Reader’s Story of How Moviepass Saved His Life

The following story was sent to me by Sean Christopher, a reader of my blog.  Sean’s story is a fascinating one, it demonstrates how Moviepass really made a difference for consumers by making moviegoing affordable again.   Unfortunately, it also chronicles the pain of investing in HMNY.   With Sean’s permission, I am posting his story here.  

This story is 100% TRUE. I’ve never written a day in my life but I needed to tell this story.

I was 19 years old when our country suffered one of the worse disasters of modern history. Imagine just starting your adult life and waking up to witness an event you would only see in movies. I never realize how much that day affected my life until today with 9/11 just days away and being sober for the first time in 16 years. In those 17 years, I suffered from depression, anxiety, and alcoholism. In all that time I tried everything from AA to therapy, but on August 15th, 2017 I came up with a different plan. This is the story of how MoviePass changed my life.
The only thing that truly helped me was going to the movies because movies for me provided an escape from the struggles of my daily life. Whether the film was based on a fantasy or based on a true story, it made me feel like parts of it were made just for me. They would capture my attention as I compared my own struggles with scenes from the movie I was watching. On August 15th, 2017 HMNY acquired MoviePass and made it’s $9.95 unlimited one movie a day monthly subscription debut. My last drink was coincidentally on that very date,  August 16th, 2017 I started to change my life. Depression is the first thing to hit you when you stop using anything that you’ve used for a long time. But now I had a secret weapon that wouldn’t put a hole in my family’s budget. MoviePass!
Every time I had a bad day and felt like having a drink I’d open my MoviePass app to see what was playing. Even if I didn’t go it made me feel better to know I had options to see a potentially good movie without worrying about wasting money. In the first few weeks, I must have seen every movie that was playing in all sorts of theaters in NYC or wherever I was at the time (P.A, N.J). I started to feel much more in control of my life, so I started to go to the movies less and worked on myself more.
I got my income tax refund and had the bright idea of throwing half of it into the stock market via my Robinhood app, I didn’t know that much about stocks and was excited to learn. Boy did I learn when I decided to put my money into a stock that was near and dear to a service that I had grown quite fond of, HMNY.  I jumped in at a little over $3 per share and was more than happy to continue to average down as the stock plummeted to spare change levels. Then came the dreaded 250/1 reverse split and my 13,000 shares became 52, I was devastated, to say the least. I lost over $15,000 – more money than I had ever put away for any reason that didn’t involve a crapload of alcohol. Uh oh, I was now in relapse territory and the depression and anger hit me like a brick to the side of the head. But I didn’t drink. Instead, I chalked it up to a “you live you learn” scenario and started thinking about everything I gained and not what I lost.
I remembered when I looked into the eyes of Ted Farnsworth at the Special Shareholders Meeting on July 23rd, 2018 and he spoke to me directly I knew in my heart that if you don’t want to get eaten by sharks, you don’t swim in the ocean. I hold absolutely no grudges because of my new found wisdom, and I am holding an even larger position in HMNY than I was before at the bottom average. Thus I’m still prepared to lose it all, (as crazy as that may sound) because I am a believer in MoviePass. I want to be there no matter what happens in the end.
I loved movies ever since I was a kid and now MoviePass has made it possible for anyone on a tight budget and a movie lover to see new releases without breaking the bank and have money for concessions.
I was still going to the movies 5-7 times a month but was so much more involved with my own life than I ever was. I only went to see my pay “for’s” and a few “never pay for’s”. But I was still getting a chance to see more movies than I normally could afford to so it worked out. After a summer of great Disney films like Infinity War, Guardians of the GalaxyVolume 2, Black Panther and Christopher Robin, Solo “wasn’t bad” and other Hollywood summer hits like Deadpool, I find myself wanting to watch more Indi films. But the new plan only offers 3 movies monthly now, so I must choose carefully, but still feel no disappointment no matter the outcome.
Three movies a month is more than enough to keep this alcoholic from going picking up a drink, so the new plan doesn’t set me back considering all my life change. If I’m having a busy month and there really isn’t anything I want to see, skipping a month wouldn’t bother me because hey, it’s only $9.95 a month.
So I believe that the new business model could be profitable for both the company and the consumer in the long term and me? For the first time in 17 years, I haven’t had a drink (1 year),  I have money in the bank and lost 25 pounds all because movie theater subscription became a reality.
Thanks MoviePass.
Sean Christopher
I love Sean’s story and hope that he continues to have awesome success with his recovery.  I  hope and pray that HMNY will also recover and deliver a great return for Sean and others.
If you have a story about Moviepass you would like to share – feel free to contact me at – @bvisse on twitter. 

Rats Jumping From Moviepass Ship

3 High Profile Departures This Week From HMNY and Moviepass Saga – Do They Matter?

This week we saw some key people head for the exits from the Moviepass story:

  • Earlier this week Board Member Carl Schramm called it quits – he claimed to be unhappy with disclosure to the board, and felt the BOD was not being consulted for big strategic decisions.
  • CPO Mike Berkley threw in the towel just today. It was not clear if he quit, was fired, or if it was a mutual agreement to part ways.
  • And on the finance side the last standing financial analyst killed off coverage of HMNY. Austin Moldlow from Canaccord Genuity, sent an email to subscribers Friday saying he was terminating coverage of MoviePass. This guy is a ghost on the web now. He even took down his LinkedIn profile. Maybe he fears his life…

Where there is a lot of turmoil, it’s not unusual to see a lot of turnover. Some people, probably wisely, just don’t want to deal with this level of headaches. BOD members see more risk than opportunity at these levels. Employees have seen their stock options implode and may lost faith that any new options or other compensation will make up for the hole they find themselves in.

On the analyst side, it has to be pretty humiliating to have a 99% wipeout on your tip sheet. Hell, this Moldlow guy may be finished after the HMNY debacle. Lawsuits are lined up a mile long, and was bullish recommending the stock almost the entire way through.

Berkley only made it 6 months, and honestly the product delivery seemed stalled or non-existent under his watch. So maybe it is a positive to see him go down the road. It’s rare to see a startup move so slowly with so many obvious things that seem easy to add from the product roadmap. Something is not working well there, maybe Berkley took the hit.

So it’s not surprising that some folks are jumping ship here. Maybe we will get lucky soon and Ted will jump ship, or get pushed off!

Expect a wild ride to continue.

Moviepass HMNY a Value Play?

HMNY Moviepass parent company is starting to look like a value play.   I have been wrong on HMNY so far – and I admit that.  But things I think this time are looking better and different for shareholders.   The company seems to be showing real stability.  They have wisely been mum on the PR front.   When everything you say is trashed in the media, it is better to simply shut up, go about your business, and prove naysayers wrong.  Ted and Mitch both have publicly stated that they have a team of people that are very motivated to prove to the world that they are right and to see to it that Moviepass survives.

I see the following key reasons why I believe Moviepass may well start a dramatic recovery very soon.

  1. The stock is trading at a very small Market Cap that simply does not make sense
  2. There is a strong possibility of a earnings surprise based on CEO’s Ted Farnsworth latest financial updates
  3. Further Dilution and or Reverse Split could be made unnecessary – maybe it becomes the opposite

Let me take on each point here.

Market Cap or Market Capitalization – What is it why it is important for HMNY 

For this blog I have decided it is better to not simply assume that all readers know all the important investing terms.  So if you are an experienced investor – sorry for the remedial lesson.   So what is Market Cap – Investopedia explains it like this.

What is ‘Market Capitalization’

Market capitalization refers to the total dollar market value of a company’s outstanding shares. Commonly referred to as “market cap,” it is calculated by multiplying a company’s shares outstanding by the current market price of one share. The investment community uses this figure to determine a company’s size, as opposed to using sales or total asset figures.

Using market capitalization to show the size of a company is important because company size is a basic determinant of various characteristics in which investors are interested, including risk. It is also easy to calculate. A company with 20 million shares selling at $100 a share would have a market cap of $2 billion.

HMNY has a very low Market Cap because the price of the stock is low – around .0225 cents.   The number of outstanding shares for HMNY is a hard thing to nail down.   The reason for that is that HMNY has approved up to 5 Billion shares via what is called an ATM offering.   Investors new to Moviepass and HMNY need to be aware of this and read up on it before investing in the stock.  Anyway, the last known reported number of outstanding shares for HMNY was 636 Million.  I have found that Yahoo! tends to have the best-updated numbers on these vital statistics.  You can see HMNY stats here.   Stock Price of .0225 times outstanding shares of 636 Million results in a $14.3 Million Market Cap.   Meaning the “size” of HMNY is quite small.  This means that the company is vulnerable to a lot of different potential outcomes.  Including a major investor taking a part of the company, an outright acquisition, and market manipulation by big money management firms among other things.   Essentially, the company is being valued at a level equal to or potentially even less than the cash they have on hand.

Unfortunately – the story is not quite so simple in the case of HMNY.  This is because HMNY  has been selling more shares on the open market to fund their losses on Moviepass and as a result, the number of shares has continued to rise.  Estimates for the number of outstanding shares now have a really big range from followers of the stock.  Some believe that the company has increased the share count to as much as 2 Billion shares.   Nobody really knows, and the company is only required to update the outstanding share count periodically.   Because nobody knows how effective the company has been cutting costs, or how eager the company is to fund new things – like investments in new films, or other acquisitions.  It is anyone’s guess on how many shares have needed to be sold or will continue to be sold to fund the company’s operations.

Whatever the number of outstanding shares now in the market, the Market Cap for the company is low.   Let’s take the very worst case scenario – that everyone agrees is unlikely at this point – say the full 5 Billion Shares are now outstanding in the market.   That would result in a Market Cap of $112 Million Dollars.  (The math here again is 5B * .0225 = 112 Million) .   Even in that very unlikely scenario, that is still a low Market Cap for a company that delivered $72 Million dollars in subscription sales the last quarter.  And is still very likely on a $200 Million dollar yearly sales/revenue pace.   (this assumes the revenue number is going to go down a little bit because of high churn from all the changes)

What this means is that the sales to price ratio for HMNY is also really low.   Looking at this metric helps to view the company in a different way.  It eliminates the variances possible with the number of outstanding shares.  Basically, this metric looks at the “revenue multiple” for a stock.   It is very unusual for a fast-growing tech company to trade at a level lower than their yearly revenue or sales number.  The S&P 500 average Price to Sales ratio is currently at 2.29.   Which is actually historically high.  The mean for the S&P 500 is 1.5.    So again, if you took a very conservative 1.5 factor to HMNY Sales/Revenu you would come up with a $300 Million valuation.  More than double the worse case scenario of 5Billion shares at .0225 or the $112 Million Market Cap.   Showing again that a conservative valuation, even with 5 Billion Shares outstanding, would be closer to .05 cents.  More than double where the stock trades today!    And this valuation would be massively conservative. 

Earnings Surprise Quite Possible

HMNY has a massive credibility issue.  Nobody believes what the management says.  Which is funny, because for the most part the company has done what it said it would do, but investors decided they hated the plan so much they would no longer support it.   Mitch and Ted always said they would lose lots of money until they got to 5 Million subscribers.  They actually estimated it pretty well, and as Mark Gomes pointed out many times, they stated it all very clearly in their SEC filings.   For whatever reason, the shorts had a heyday when the company delivered exactly the losses predicted and punished the stock massively.   Ted also made some verbal errors along the way mistakingly calling they ATM a line of credit, which totally freaked out investors, and drove the stock down to near zero.    For people who have followed the stock all along, that was a painful and really bizarre period.  It is what led to the plan changes and all the confusion around the prior business model.  We will never really know if 5 Million seasoned subscribers could have made a breakeven scenario, as the company simply could not get enough funding to get there.   Most now believe that was never going to be possible, both because usage was higher than expected, and theaters would not cut a deal with Moviepass to provide discounted tickets or share any revenue.

Now that the subscriber plans have changed Farnsworth has publicly stated that subscriber revenue is now at break even.  He said utilization is low at .9 movies per month.   We don’t know how much money management has spent on new endeavors, and we also don’t know if the company is having any better success working with studios or other partners to monetize their customer base.   From my updated model, it looks at least possible that the company could achieve breakeven or even make a positive gross margin on the subscription business with the numbers provided by Farnsworth.   The problem really is one of perception and sentiment regarding Farnsworth and whether investors can trust management to protect shareholders from bad decisions.   As it stands now the stock is trading at a discount because so many people have such little faith in Farnsworth, and in the management generally, they simply do not believe the numbers Farnsworth is giving.

This is where a positive ER update, that shows break even on subscriber revenue and shows only a small overall loss for the company, could end up boosting this stock price very quickly.   This, of course, does cut both ways, if there are substantially more losses than expected, the company could move even closer to 0.000.   I think an ER surprise with upside looks more likely.  I think the updated plans that really eliminated the heavy user problem will be enough to change the company’s burn rate massively.    Also, Ted is already in so much hot water with pending lawsuits, and SEC investigations, I just don’t believe he is stupid enough to lie about these things,  Specifically, he would not say that they have already hit break even on subs.  As that is NOT a forward-looking statement, and as such, he is not protected at all with that statement and if it incorrect, he faces even more legal problems.    That said, Ted has proven to be a bit of a goon, so he could just be making another stupid mistake or lying again.

Further Dilution May Not Be Needed – Maybe the Opposite

If it turns out that the burn rate has come down to very low levels, and HMNY hits breakeven on the subscription business the stock could be triggered to move up very quickly.   Here is how this could work out.  If Moviepass shows that it’s subscriber base has value in of itself, that will prove to Wall Street money managers that they have a sustainable asset in the business.   I worked on many M&A deals in my past life, and I know this is a fact.  If a business has a “sustainable book of business” than it has real value.  Even if it is only at breakeven.

There is value in breakeven revenue.  The thought process on that goes like this.  If we buy this company, it will consistently deliver at least $200 million to our topline revenue number, plus we will be getting a strategic growth asset, some technology, and a well-known brand.   This is a standard way of breaking down piece parts of any acquisition type deal.

Wall Street Banks and Money Managers understand all of this very well.  This is important because what happens when you have a sustainable subscription revenue business is you now have something that looks like collateral to a bank.  It is an asset, like when you take a loan on a car or a house.  It has a value the bank can see, and it makes it much more likely that Moviepass can get a loan, or as they say, take on debt financing.    They might even be able to get a substantial amount of debt financing.   This could have a big multiplier effect on HMNY stock.  Here’s why.

First, if the company can take on debt, instead of diluting shareholders, the dumping of more shares to raise operating funds could end, and end quickly.   Second, the company could also use debt funds to buy back cheap shares of their stock.   This would totally upend the fear of bears who think that the company is setting out to keep diluting shareholders into eternity.    A scenario could easily develop where the company is loaned enough money to fund operations and buy back a massive amount of the outstanding shares.  This would be a double whammy on the stock price, you could see the share price jump massively in this scenario.

Be warned!  The opposite of all of this could also happen.   And if you believe history repeats, and you think it will repeat here, you should stay far away from the stock.

This all comes down to a question of what do you believe?   Do you think Ted is lying about being breakeven?   Or do you think that Ted and Mitch are going to drop an earnings bomb so big it explodes the stock upward?   Or do you believe the new product is a loser and subs will never grow again?  Or do you think Moviepass is still a good value and will continue to find new customers?

I think Moviepass may finally be ready to turn itself around.  I think the current conservative valuation on the company makes it a value play, but not without risk.   If I am right, this could finally be an entry point worth making.